From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
sbw@mit.edu, patches@linaro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Permit RCU_NONIDLE() to be used from interrupt context
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 17:42:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905004248.GA12373@jtriplet-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346802402.27919.44.camel@gandalf.local.home>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:46:42PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 16:33 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >
> > > > +#ifdef MODULE
> > > > +#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
> > > > + static inline void trace_##name##_rcuidle(proto) \
> > > > + { \
> > > > + if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) \
> > > > + __DO_TRACE(&__tracepoint_##name, \
> > > > + TP_PROTO(data_proto), \
> > > > + TP_ARGS(data_args), \
> > > > + TP_CONDITION(cond), \
> > > > + rcu_idle_exit(), \
> > > > + rcu_idle_enter()); \
> > > > + }
> > > > +#else
> > > > +#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args)
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Egad! More macros on top of macros! Yeah I know I'm the most guilty of
> > > this, but it just seems to add one more indirection that I would like to
> > > avoid.
> >
> > This doesn't seem to add a significant amount of complexity; it forwards
> > exactly the same parameters to the helper macro, and just moves the one
> > function definition there and makes it conditional. This still seems
> > more preferable than exporting functions just so they won't get called.
>
> The change itself is not complex. But what is already there is complex
> enough. I'm talking more about adding to:
>
> $ grep '#define' include/linux/tracepoint.h
> #define _LINUX_TRACEPOINT_H
> #define PARAMS(args...) args
> #define TP_PROTO(args...) args
> #define TP_ARGS(args...) args
> #define TP_CONDITION(args...) args
> #define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, prercu, postrcu) \
> #define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
> #define DEFINE_TRACE_FN(name, reg, unreg) \
> #define DEFINE_TRACE(name) \
> #define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(name) \
> #define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(name) \
> #define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
> #define DEFINE_TRACE_FN(name, reg, unreg)
> #define DEFINE_TRACE(name)
> #define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(name)
> #define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(name)
> #define DECLARE_TRACE_NOARGS(name) \
> #define DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args) \
> #define DECLARE_TRACE_CONDITION(name, proto, args, cond) \
> #define TRACE_EVENT_FLAGS(event, flag)
> #define DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(name, proto, args, tstruct, assign, print)
> #define DEFINE_EVENT(template, name, proto, args) \
> #define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT(template, name, proto, args, print) \
> #define DEFINE_EVENT_CONDITION(template, name, proto, \
> #define TRACE_EVENT(name, proto, args, struct, assign, print) \
> #define TRACE_EVENT_FN(name, proto, args, struct, \
> #define TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(name, proto, args, cond, \
> #define TRACE_EVENT_FLAGS(event, flag)
Yeah, I've had the adventure of hand-tracing through most of those in
the past myself. :) At least they have a fairly clear hierarchy,
without particularly complex conditionals.
Ah, for a language with decent code generation facilities. :)
> > I could live with that; it seems preferable to unnecessary exports,
> > though it still seems much uglier to me than the conditional definition
> > of trace_*_rcuidle. :)
>
> We could add either. Probably keep the ugliness of tracepoints inside
> the tracepoint code than to start spreading it around to rcu. RCU has
> its own ugliness features ;-)
>
> Hence, I would be OK if you send me a patch that does what you proposed
> and removes the EXPORT from RCU.
To clarify: does what I proposed as in the macro change to avoid
defining trace_*_rcuidle in modules, or makes the change to define panicy
versions of the two functions trace_*_rcuidle needs?
- Josh Triplett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-30 18:56 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/15] Miscellaneous fixes Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Add PROVE_RCU_DELAY to provoke difficult races Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Pull TINY_RCU dyntick-idle tracing into non-idle region Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 16:53 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Properly initialize ->boost_tasks on CPU offline Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 17:56 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-06 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-06 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Permit RCU_NONIDLE() to be used from interrupt context Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:00 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 22:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-04 22:48 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 22:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-04 23:08 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 23:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-04 23:33 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 23:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-06 18:54 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-06 19:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-07 6:09 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-07 14:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-07 14:47 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-07 15:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-12 1:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-12 14:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-12 15:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-12 15:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-12 16:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-04 23:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-05 0:42 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-09-05 6:23 ` [PATCH] trace: Don't declare trace_*_rcuidle functions in modules Josh Triplett
2012-09-05 14:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-09-05 16:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-06 19:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-14 6:07 ` [tip:core/rcu] trace: Don' t " tip-bot for Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 23:14 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Permit RCU_NONIDLE() to be used from interrupt context Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] rcu: Improve boost selection when moving tasks to root rcu_node Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:09 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Make offline-CPU checking allow for indefinite delays Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:12 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Fix obsolete rcu_initiate_boost() header comment Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:13 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/15] rcu: Apply for_each_rcu_flavor() to increment_cpu_stall_ticks() Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:15 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 22:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/15] rcu: Avoid rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp() segfault Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:19 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 22:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-04 22:55 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Protect rcu_node accesses during CPU stall warnings Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:23 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 22:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-06 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-06 21:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] rcu: Avoid spurious RCU " Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:24 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-06 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-06 15:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-06 15:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-06 21:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-06 21:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-06 21:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-06 22:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-06 22:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-07 7:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-07 14:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/15] rcu: Remove redundant memory barrier from __call_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:30 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-31 18:40 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] rcu: Move TINY_PREEMPT_RCU away from raw_local_irq_save() Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:34 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 23:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/15] time: RCU permitted to stop idle entry via softirq Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:51 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-06 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-06 21:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-06 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-09-06 22:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-30 18:56 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] kmemleak: Replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 18:55 ` Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 23:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-31 16:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Add PROVE_RCU_DELAY to provoke difficult races Josh Triplett
2012-09-04 22:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-06 14:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-06 20:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-07 6:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120905004248.GA12373@jtriplet-mobl1 \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).