From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: first step towards hierarchical controller
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:12:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905201238.GE13737@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120905144942.GH5388@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Hello, Michal.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:49:42PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Can we settle on the following 3 steps?
> 1) warn about "flat" hierarchies (give it X releases) - I will push it
> to as many Suse code streams as possible (hope other distributions
> could do the same)
I think I'm just gonna trigger WARN from cgroup core if anyone tries
to create hierarchy with a controller which doesn't support full
hierarchy. WARN_ON_ONCE() at first and then WARN_ON() on each
creation later on.
> 2) flip the default on the root cgroup & warn when somebody tries to
> change it to 0 (give it another X releases) that the knob will be
> removed
> 3) remove the knob and the whole nonsese
> 4) revert 3 if somebody really objects
If we can get to 3, I don't think 4 would be a problem.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-03 15:46 [PATCH v2] memcg: first step towards hierarchical controller Glauber Costa
2012-09-03 16:41 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-09-04 8:29 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-03 17:08 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-04 8:34 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-04 13:09 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-04 13:27 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-04 14:35 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-04 14:37 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-04 14:54 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-04 14:54 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-04 16:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-05 8:14 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-05 14:49 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-05 20:12 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-09-06 12:06 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-06 12:09 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-06 12:18 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-07 9:45 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-04 18:22 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120905201238.GE13737@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).