From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752704Ab2IFM2w (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:28:52 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:62467 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751020Ab2IFM2v (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:28:51 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,380,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="189602465" Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 05:28:50 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Tony Luck Cc: Andi Kleen , "Naveen N. Rao" , bp@amd64.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, ananth@in.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] [mcelog] Start using the new sysfs tunables location Message-ID: <20120906122850.GI17289@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20120905102156.9423.27806.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20120905103237.9726.56131.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20120905184708.GC16230@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The change is still under discussion. Stage one is to add the new global > pathnames in addition to keeping the old per-cpu ones. Also fix all utilities > (just mcelog(8) as far as we know) to prefer the new paths. But why do you even want to change it? Does it fix anything? AFAIK the old setup -- while not being pretty -- works just fine. -Andi