From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760180Ab2IGGJv (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 02:09:51 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:34027 "EHLO relay3-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752646Ab2IGGJu (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 02:09:50 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.148 X-Originating-IP: 50.43.46.74 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 23:09:40 -0700 From: Josh Triplett To: Steven Rostedt Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu, patches@linaro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Permit RCU_NONIDLE() to be used from interrupt context Message-ID: <20120907060940.GA21166@leaf> References: <1346352988-32444-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120831180052.GB4259@jtriplet-mobl1> <20120904223350.GQ2593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1346799082.27919.31.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20120904230834.GB11494@jtriplet-mobl1> <1346801031.27919.39.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20120904233344.GB11855@jtriplet-mobl1> <20120904234307.GY2593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120906185402.GB5738@jtriplet-mobl1> <1346961244.1680.46.camel@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1346961244.1680.46.camel@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:54:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:54 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Not sure I see much difference in aesthetics between the three approaches, > > > but am willing to switch over to a generally agreed-upon scheme. > > > > Steve, could I get an ack from you on the patch I sent? > > I acked it, but do you just want me to take the patch? I'm getting ready > for another 3.7 push to tip. Up to Paul. What would make it easiest to coordinate that patch and the corresponding bits in the RCU patch series? - Josh Triplett