From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753441Ab2IHMvL (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Sep 2012 08:51:11 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]:39929 "EHLO mail-yw0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752300Ab2IHMvH (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Sep 2012 08:51:07 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 44321 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 08:51:07 EDT Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 05:50:59 -0700 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Corey Ashford , Frederic Weisbecker , David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] perf diff: Refactor stdio ui data columns output Message-ID: <20120908125059.GG20401@ghostprotocols.net> References: <1346946426-13496-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1346946426-13496-6-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <878vcmczjt.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <20120908123514.GA3408@krava.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120908123514.GA3408@krava.brq.redhat.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 02:35:14PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:55:02AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Hi, Jiri > > > > On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:46:59 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > Currently for any of the data columns (like Overhead/Period..) in > > > stdio ui, there's separate code to print header/dots/value scattered > > > along the display code path. > > > > > > Adding hists_stdio_column struct to centralize all info needed > > > to print column header/dots/value. > > > > > > This change eases up addition for new columns, which is now mostly > > > matter only of adding new hists_stdio_column struct. > > > > As you may know, I submitted a similar patchset few days ago for the > > same reason and it handles TUI/GTK cases as well. I'm waiting for > > reviews. > > ok, I'll rebase this to acme/tmp.perf/hpp well, you can, but that one is buggy and you will not be able to test 'perf diff' at all... - Arnaldo