From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@gmail.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7 V6] workqueue: fix idle worker depletion
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 12:02:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120908190204.GA12773@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACvQF51PY95Eg+DLhZ4ZRRNK0x9q+pOzrPfZbhTnPvk35j8PNg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, Lai.
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 02:34:02AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> in 3.6 busy_worker_rebind() handle WORKER_REBIND bit,
> not WORKER_UNBOUND bit.
>
> busy_worker_rebind() takes struct work_struct *work argument, we have to
> add new patch to add a helper and restruct it at first.
What's wrong with just treating manager as busy. Factor out,
rebind_work scheduling from rebind_workers() and call it for busy
workers and the manager if it exists. manage_workers() only need to
call process_scheduled_works(). Wouldn't that work?
> worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() 's mean is very clear
> here. busy_worker_rebind() seems for busy workers, manager is not
> busy workers.
I don't know. It just seems unnecessarily wordy. If you don't like
reusing the busy worker path, how about just calling
maybe_bind_and_lock() unconditionally after locking manager_mutex? I
mean, can't it just do the following?
spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
/*
* Explain what's going on.
*/
mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
if (worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(worker))
worker_clr_flags(worker, WORKER_UNBOUND);
ret = true;
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-08 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-08 17:12 [PATCH 0/7 V6] workqueue: fix hoplug things Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/7 V6] workqueue: ensure the wq_worker_sleeping() see the right flags Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:12 ` [PATCH 2/7 V6] workqueue: async idle rebinding Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:12 ` [PATCH 3/7 V6] workqueue: add manager pointer for worker_pool Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:12 ` [PATCH 4/7 V6] workqueue: fix idle worker depletion Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:40 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-08 17:50 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:53 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-08 18:07 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 18:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-08 18:34 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 19:02 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-09-09 4:09 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-09 6:30 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-08 17:12 ` [PATCH 5/7 V6] workqueue: rename manager_mutex to assoc_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:12 ` [PATCH 6/7 V6] workqueue: new day don't need WORKER_REBIND for busy rebinding Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:12 ` [PATCH 7/7 V6] workqueue: remove WORKER_REBIND Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:27 ` [PATCH 0/7 V6] workqueue: fix hoplug things Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:34 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:37 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-08 17:46 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:50 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-08 17:51 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-08 17:56 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-08 17:59 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-08 18:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120908190204.GA12773@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=eag0628@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).