From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
"3.2.x.." <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
Cris <linux-cris-kernel@axis.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Add missing RCU idle APIs on idle loop v2
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:35:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120911123528.GG21277@somewhere.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120910225845.GC4257@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:58:45PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Anyway, should I resend the patchset with this thing fixed?
>
> Please feel free to do so. ;-)
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
So here it is.
On the menu for the updated branch:
- fixed stable tags (use # 3.3+)
- not sure what to do with "alpha: Fix preemption handling in idle loop",
tag as stable or not?
- added tested-by Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> for alpha patches
- propagate rename to rcu_user_*_after_irq() in the commit changelog
- remove trailing #endif in "rcu: New rcu_user_enter_after_irq() and rcu_user_exit_after_irq() APIs"
and early rcu_user_hooks_switch() header as well (reported by WU Fenguang).
- add rcu_user_hooks_switch() header in "rcu: Switch task's syscall hooks on context switch"
I believe this all should also fix what WU Fenguang reported:
[rcu:rcu:next 54/82] include/linux/rcupdate.h:202:20: error: redefinition of 'rcu_user_exit'
[rcu:rcu:next 54/82] include/linux/rcupdate.h:401:19: error: redefinition of 'rcu_read_lock_bh_held'
[rcu:rcu:idle 2/27] include/linux/rcupdate.h:969:2: error: #endif without #if
I'm not reposting the patches because few things have actually changed, except a few neats and some stuff
that have been moved from a patch to another to unbreak bisection. But the end result is about the same.
You can check the difference with a git diff between our branches.
If you want to, though, I can repost the patches.
This is pullable from:
git://github.com/fweisbec/linux-dynticks.git
rcu/idle-for-v3.7
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-11 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 14:58 [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Add missing RCU idle APIs on idle loop v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 01/11] alpha: Fix preemption handling in idle loop Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 02/11] alpha: Add missing RCU idle APIs on " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 03/11] cris: " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 04/11] frv: " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 05/11] h8300: " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 06/11] m32r: " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 07/11] m68k: " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 08/11] mn10300: " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 09/11] parisc: " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 10/11] score: " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-23 14:58 ` [PATCH 11/11] xtensa: " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-24 21:26 ` [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Add missing RCU idle APIs on idle loop v2 Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-25 1:19 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-25 2:10 ` Michael Cree
2012-08-25 3:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-25 13:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-25 16:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-25 21:15 ` Michael Cree
2012-08-26 0:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-26 9:21 ` Tobias Klausmann
2012-09-10 21:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-12 18:01 ` Tobias Klausmann
2012-09-10 21:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-10 22:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-11 12:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120911123528.GG21277@somewhere.redhat.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cris-kernel@axis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mcree@orcon.net.nz \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=starvik@axis.com \
--cc=takata@linux-m32r.org \
--cc=yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).