From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757146Ab2IKXZl (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:25:41 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56953 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753881Ab2IKXZj (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:25:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:25:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Pavel Machek Cc: David Rientjes , sgruszka@redhat.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, johannes.berg@intel.com, wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com, ilw@linux.intel.com, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: iwl3945: order 5 allocation during ifconfig up; vm problem? Message-Id: <20120911162536.bd5171a1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120910111113.GA25159@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20120909213228.GA5538@elf.ucw.cz> <20120910111113.GA25159@elf.ucw.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:11:13 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2012-09-09 15:40:55, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > On 3.6.0-rc2+, I tried to turn on the wireless, but got > > > > > > root@amd:~# ifconfig wlan0 10.0.0.6 up > > > SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot allocate memory > > > SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot allocate memory > > > root@amd:~# > > > > > > It looks like it uses "a bit too big" allocations to allocate > > > firmware...? Order five allocation.... > > > > > > Hmm... then I did "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" and now the > > > network works. Is it VM problem that it failed to allocate memory when > > > it was freeable? > > > > > > > Do you have CONFIG_COMPACTION enabled? > > Yes: > > pavel@amd:/data/l/linux-good$ zgrep CONFIG_COMPACTION /proc/config.gz > CONFIG_COMPACTION=y Asking for a 256k allocation is pretty crazy - this is an operating system kernel, not a userspace application. I'm wondering if this is due to a recent change, but I'm having trouble working out where the allocation call site is.