From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756835Ab2ILBHf (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:07:35 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:57220 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754809Ab2ILBHd (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:07:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:07:21 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Josh Triplett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu, patches@linaro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Permit RCU_NONIDLE() to be used from interrupt context Message-ID: <20120912010720.GM4257@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20120904230834.GB11494@jtriplet-mobl1> <1346801031.27919.39.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20120904233344.GB11855@jtriplet-mobl1> <20120904234307.GY2593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120906185402.GB5738@jtriplet-mobl1> <1346961244.1680.46.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20120907060940.GA21166@leaf> <20120907142441.GD2462@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120907144717.GA22059@leaf> <1347030967.8178.15.camel@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1347030967.8178.15.camel@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12091201-3534-0000-0000-00000C905AF2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 07:47 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:24:41AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:09:40PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:54:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:54 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > > > Not sure I see much difference in aesthetics between the three approaches, > > > > > > > but am willing to switch over to a generally agreed-upon scheme. > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve, could I get an ack from you on the patch I sent? > > > > > > > > > > I acked it, but do you just want me to take the patch? I'm getting ready > > > > > for another 3.7 push to tip. > > > > > > > > Up to Paul. What would make it easiest to coordinate that patch and the > > > > corresponding bits in the RCU patch series? > > > > > > All I need to do is to eventually remove the exports, correct? > > > If so, full speed ahead! > > > > Sounds like you could go ahead and remove the exports now, and just make > > sure Steve's push goes in before yours. > > > > Is there any rush to do this? I just plan on pushing it for 3.7. > > Paul, you just push your changes through tip, right? Then we can just > let Ingo know. I could even make the patch a separate branch, that Ingo > can pull into the RCU branch too. Yep! But we also need to worry about -next and -fengguang. How about if you push your change into 3.7 and I push mine into 3.8? Thanx, Paul