From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756570Ab2INJjv (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 05:39:51 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:45849 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750934Ab2INJju (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 05:39:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:39:45 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Lee Jones Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed via Device Tree Message-ID: <20120914093945.GB2630@pengutronix.de> References: <1347016499-29354-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1347016499-29354-13-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120912105202.GD2624@pengutronix.de> <20120914082754.GE3374@gmail.com> <20120914084141.GA2630@pengutronix.de> <20120914090228.GH3374@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120914090228.GH3374@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:221:70ff:fe71:1890 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: w.sang@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Ah, sorry. That's my fault for rushing though my ridiculously bloated pos= t- > vacation inbox. :) > > all the infos I got. Some more context would have been helpful. Is there > > a branch somewhere with all the things collected? >=20 > There will be. I'm currently just Ack collecting.=20 >=20 > In fact wait ... >=20 > <3 mins pass> >=20 > Now there is: > git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git preview-for-next OK from having a glimpse, I'd prefer to squash (or have squashed) i2c: nomadik: Add Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver Documentation: Device Tree binding information for i2c-nomadik driver (Documentation should go along with the code) i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed via Device Tree into one patch and take that via the I2C tree. This will allow me to resolve the merge conflict in my tree on my own. I don't see a strong reason to have those go via arm-soc (like prevented build-failures or easier merges), if I missed such a reason, please let me know. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBS+2EACgkQD27XaX1/VRtJ+QCggp2+0Dm+twmxqaBtQgraVDhM w9IAn3V8y8ESJ1xAw8kN9Md37aTJX2VD =/HGK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH--