From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750877Ab2IOEBD (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:01:03 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:34601 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750704Ab2IOEBB (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:01:01 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:00:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20120915.000059.636218745264773259.davem@davemloft.net> To: linux@arm.linux.org.uk Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, nico@linaro.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/24] net: seeq: use __iomem pointers for MMIO From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20120914235607.GF12245@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1347658492-11608-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1347658492-11608-25-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20120914235607.GF12245@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Russell King - ARM Linux Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:56:07 +0100 > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, >> so we need to use the correct types everywhere. > > Same comment as for eesox. const void __iomem * is not a problem on > x86, so it should not be a problem on ARM. Agreed.