linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.6-rc6 1/2] workqueue: reimplement work_on_cpu() using system_wq
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:49:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120918204934.GG8474@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwt9Wd9cwk3B4U0+B+EyBJm8oG0r0ADQvEa0D4HmrMWQQ@mail.gmail.com>

The existing work_on_cpu() implementation is hugely inefficient.  It
creates a new kthread, execute that single function and then let the
kthread die on each invocation.

Now that system_wq can handle concurrent executions, there's no
advantage of doing this.  Reimplement work_on_cpu() using system_wq
which makes it simpler and way more efficient.

stable: While this isn't a fix in itself, it's needed to fix a
        workqueue related bug in cpufreq/powernow-k8.  AFAICS, this
        shouldn't break other existing users.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
So, here are the two patches which can be applied to 3.6-rc6.  I'll
post a combined patch to the bugzilla so that Duncan can test it.

The only worrying thing is that this might affect the existing
work_on_cpu() users in some crazy subtle way.  I can't see how it
would break anything but it's when I think like that when something
bites me.  That said, pci-driver is probably the most common use case
and it seems to work fine here.

Thanks.

 kernel/workqueue.c |   27 +++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3576,18 +3576,17 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_down_
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 
 struct work_for_cpu {
-	struct completion completion;
+	struct work_struct work;
 	long (*fn)(void *);
 	void *arg;
 	long ret;
 };
 
-static int do_work_for_cpu(void *_wfc)
+static void work_for_cpu_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	struct work_for_cpu *wfc = _wfc;
+	struct work_for_cpu *wfc = container_of(work, struct work_for_cpu, work);
+
 	wfc->ret = wfc->fn(wfc->arg);
-	complete(&wfc->completion);
-	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -3602,19 +3601,11 @@ static int do_work_for_cpu(void *_wfc)
  */
 long work_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, long (*fn)(void *), void *arg)
 {
-	struct task_struct *sub_thread;
-	struct work_for_cpu wfc = {
-		.completion = COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(wfc.completion),
-		.fn = fn,
-		.arg = arg,
-	};
-
-	sub_thread = kthread_create(do_work_for_cpu, &wfc, "work_for_cpu");
-	if (IS_ERR(sub_thread))
-		return PTR_ERR(sub_thread);
-	kthread_bind(sub_thread, cpu);
-	wake_up_process(sub_thread);
-	wait_for_completion(&wfc.completion);
+	struct work_for_cpu wfc = { .fn = fn, .arg = arg };
+
+	INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&wfc.work, work_for_cpu_fn);
+	schedule_work_on(cpu, &wfc.work);
+	flush_work(&wfc.work);
 	return wfc.ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu);

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-18 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-17 20:17 [PATCH 3.6-rc6] cpufreq/powernow-k8: workqueue user shouldn't migrate the kworker to another CPU Tejun Heo
2012-09-17 20:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-17 20:53   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-17 21:22     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-17 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-23  1:53   ` Thomas Renninger
2012-09-18 20:12 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-18 20:27   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-18 20:49     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-09-18 20:51       ` [PATCH 3.6-rc6 2/2] " Tejun Heo
2012-09-18 20:30   ` [PATCH 3.6-rc6] " Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120918204934.GG8474@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).