From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753170Ab2IRX42 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:56:28 -0400
Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:40276 "EHLO
	kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752012Ab2IRX41 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:56:27 -0400
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:56:21 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
        Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] ARM: shmobile: use __iomem pointers for MMIO
Message-ID: <20120918235619.GA12583@verge.net.au>
References: <1347658492-11608-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
 <201209180831.06572.arnd@arndb.de>
 <20120918115038.GB3198@verge.net.au>
 <201209181604.49562.arnd@arndb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201209181604.49562.arnd@arndb.de>
Organisation: Horms Solutions Ltd.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:04:49PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 September 2012, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > I agree it's not nice to have to do this, but this is largely because
> > > of shmobile doing things differently from all other ARM platforms, on
> > > which the respective patches tend to clean up things and reduce the
> > > number of type casts.
> > > 
> > > The only alternative I can see is for shmobile to introduce its own
> > > mach/io.h file with the relaxed type checking, but that would only
> > > defer the problem until the point where you want shmobile to be part
> > > of the common multiplatform kernel binary.
> > 
> > If it is needed in the long term, then I'm happy with it going in now.
> > Could you remove the portion that Paul objected to?
> 
> Yes, I already did that.

Great, thanks.