linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@ti.com>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Philippe Begnic <philippe.begnic@st.com>,
	Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>,
	Michel Jaouen <michel.jaouen@stericsson.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:42:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120919164231.17033.27762@nucleus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120919160251.GM28670@sortiz-mobl>

Quoting Samuel Ortiz (2012-09-19 09:02:51)
> Hi Ulf,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:21:30PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > From: Michel Jaouen <michel.jaouen@stericsson.com>
> > 
> > The local timer clock is based on ARM subsystem clock. This patch
> > obtains a more exact value of that clock by reading PRCMU registers.
> > Using this increases the accuracy of the local timer events.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michel Jaouen <michel.jaouen@stericsson.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c       |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/mfd/dbx500-prcmu-regs.h  |    4 +++-
> >  include/linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h |    1 +
> >  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
> > index 4f74529..e7f9539 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
> > @@ -418,6 +418,9 @@ static struct {
> >  
> >  static atomic_t ac_wake_req_state = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> >  
> > +/* Functions definition */
> > +static void compute_armss_rate(void);
> > +
> I'm not a big fan of forward declarations, but I still applied your patch to
> my for-next branch. Thanks.
> 

Samuel,

Not sure if you were Cc'd on the rest of the patches in this series but
after some discussion (see patch #1) I took all four patches into
clk-next, including the MFD change.  This was done first week of
September.  At this point those patches have shifted into my stable
branch that I have promised not to rebase (for arm-soc dependencies).

Are you OK with me taking this patch through the clk-next branch?

Regards,
Mike

> Cheers,
> Samuel.
> 
> -- 
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> http://oss.intel.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-19 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-31 12:21 [PATCH 0/4] clk: Support for smp_twd clock for ux500 Ulf Hansson
2012-08-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] clk: Provide option for clk_get_rate to issue hw for new rate Ulf Hansson
2012-08-31 19:29   ` Mike Turquette
2012-09-06  9:09     ` Ulf Hansson
     [not found]       ` <20120907001927.20289.41627@nucleus>
2012-09-07  1:00         ` Turquette, Mike
2012-09-07  8:21           ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-07 12:29             ` Ulf Hansson
2012-09-07 21:34               ` Linus Walleij
2012-08-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] clk: ux500: Support for prmcu_rate clock Ulf Hansson
2012-08-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock Ulf Hansson
2012-09-19 16:02   ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-09-19 16:42     ` Mike Turquette [this message]
2012-09-19 16:56       ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-08-31 12:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] clk: ux500: Define smp_twd clock for u8500 Ulf Hansson
2012-08-31 23:32 ` [PATCH 0/4] clk: Support for smp_twd clock for ux500 Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120919164231.17033.27762@nucleus \
    --to=mturquette@ti.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michel.jaouen@stericsson.com \
    --cc=philippe.begnic@st.com \
    --cc=rickard.andersson@stericsson.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).