From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932450Ab2ISQog (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:44:36 -0400 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:11786 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756486Ab2ISQoc (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:44:32 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 98.234.237.12 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+e9ouWskCnQHjDBmG7elCs Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:44:24 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Russell King , Nicolas Pitre , Felipe Balbi , Lokesh Vutla , Santosh Shilimkar , Shubhrajyoti D , sricharan Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/24] ARM: OMAP: use __iomem pointers for MMIO Message-ID: <20120919164424.GD11762@atomide.com> References: <1347658492-11608-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20120916203850.GI4521@atomide.com> <20120917212506.GB11762@atomide.com> <201209191335.48051.arnd@arndb.de> <20120919133648.GB6106@arwen.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120919133648.GB6106@arwen.pp.htv.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Felipe Balbi [120919 06:42]: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:35:47PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 17 September 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Tony Lindgren [120916 13:39]: > > > > * Arnd Bergmann [120915 13:15]: > > > > > On Saturday 15 September 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > With my patches, this is now all omap1 specific and > > > > > > moved to arch/arm/mach-omap1/include/mach/hardware.h. > > > > > > It's probably easiest to just update this patch on > > > > > > top of the hardware.h changes I've done. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, sounds good. Do you want to send a patch for that > > > > > and let me drop this one then? > > > > > > > > Yes I can pick this one and update it against one of my > > > > branches to avoid merge conflicts. > > > > > > This applies against mach-omap1/include/mach/hardware.h > > > with some fuzz so no issues there. > > > > > > But I think we should not apply it as these are physical > > > addresses, not virtual addresses for omap1. > > > > Right, I misread what is actually going on here because the > > only driver I looked at treated the address as a virtual > > address pointer. > > > > > We have IOMEM already in use for omap_read/write because of: > > > > > > #define OMAP1_IO_ADDRESS(pa) IOMEM((pa) - OMAP1_IO_OFFSET) > > > > > > I think the right solution is to eventually get rid of > > > omap_read/write for omap1 also and replace them with ioremap > > > + readl/writel. > > > > Agreed. OK. > > > Or am I missing something? > > > > I did not see any new warnings for omap1, but I did see this > > on omap2plus_defconfig: > > > > drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c: In function 'omap_wdt_ioctl': > > drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c:222:4: error: passing argument 1 of '__raw_readw' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror] > > arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:71:90: note: expected 'const volatile void *' but argument is of type 'unsigned int' > > > > It seems I misinterpreted this, and it's actually a bug in the watchdog > > driver that should be fixed using this patch instead (and backport it > > to stable) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c > > index fceec4f..7b45802 100644 > > --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c > > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c > > @@ -218,9 +218,11 @@ static long omap_wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, > > case WDIOC_GETSTATUS: > > return put_user(0, (int __user *)arg); > > case WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1 > > if (cpu_is_omap16xx()) > > - return put_user(__raw_readw(ARM_SYSST), > > + return put_user(omap_readw(ARM_SYSST), > > (int __user *)arg); > > +#endif > > indeed... my bad. I agree this should be changed by something better > though. Yes that's wrong. Regards, Tony