From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756213Ab2ISQ4I (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:56:08 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:25806 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753424Ab2ISQ4G (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:56:06 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,450,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="224145592" Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:56:00 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Mike Turquette Cc: Ulf Hansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Lee Jones , Philippe Begnic , Srinidhi Kasagar , Michel Jaouen , Ulf Hansson , Rickard Andersson Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock Message-ID: <20120919165600.GP28670@sortiz-mobl> References: <1346415691-13371-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <1346415691-13371-4-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <20120919160251.GM28670@sortiz-mobl> <20120919164231.17033.27762@nucleus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120919164231.17033.27762@nucleus> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mike, On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:42:31AM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Samuel Ortiz (2012-09-19 09:02:51) > > Hi Ulf, > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:21:30PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > From: Michel Jaouen > > > > > > The local timer clock is based on ARM subsystem clock. This patch > > > obtains a more exact value of that clock by reading PRCMU registers. > > > Using this increases the accuracy of the local timer events. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson > > > Signed-off-by: Rickard Andersson > > > Signed-off-by: Michel Jaouen > > > --- > > > drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/mfd/dbx500-prcmu-regs.h | 4 +++- > > > include/linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h | 1 + > > > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c > > > index 4f74529..e7f9539 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c > > > @@ -418,6 +418,9 @@ static struct { > > > > > > static atomic_t ac_wake_req_state = ATOMIC_INIT(0); > > > > > > +/* Functions definition */ > > > +static void compute_armss_rate(void); > > > + > > I'm not a big fan of forward declarations, but I still applied your patch to > > my for-next branch. Thanks. > > > > Samuel, > > Not sure if you were Cc'd on the rest of the patches in this series but > after some discussion (see patch #1) I took all four patches into > clk-next, including the MFD change. This was done first week of > September. At this point those patches have shifted into my stable > branch that I have promised not to rebase (for arm-soc dependencies). > > Are you OK with me taking this patch through the clk-next branch? Yes, I'm fine with it. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/