From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752308Ab2JBFc2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 01:32:28 -0400 Received: from host-176-100-244-43.masterbit.su ([176.100.244.43]:43128 "EHLO tservice.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750753Ab2JBFc0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 01:32:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 09:32:23 +0400 From: Evgeniy Polyakov To: Fabio Estevam Cc: s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] w1: mxc_w1: Adapt the clock name to the new clock framework Message-ID: <20121002053223.GA20786@ioremap.net> References: <1346950139-17059-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com> <5069D830.6070307@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5069D830.6070307@freescale.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 02:51:44PM -0300, Fabio Estevam (fabio.estevam@freescale.com) wrote: > Evgeny, > > Any comments, please? I have no objections per se, but I'm hardly an expert in imx clock framework :) Since it is only one patch in set of 3, I suppose it will be pushed through different tree than w1. Feel free to add my ack. Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov -- Evgeniy Polyakov