From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756022Ab2JDTMb (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2012 15:12:31 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:55459 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755454Ab2JDTM3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2012 15:12:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 20:17:04 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Greg KH Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Kay Sievers , Linus Torvalds , Andy Walls , Al Viro , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Ming Lei , Lennart Poettering , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kay Sievers , Linux Media Mailing List , Michael Krufky , Ivan Kalvachev Subject: Re: udev breakages - Message-ID: <20121004201704.36d35755@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20121004174254.GA14301@kroah.com> References: <506C562E.5090909@redhat.com> <20121003170907.GA23473@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20121003195059.GA13541@kroah.com> <3560b86d-e2ad-484d-ab6e-2b9048894a12@email.android.com> <87zk42tab4.fsf@xmission.com> <20121004174254.GA14301@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I don't know how to handle the /dev/ptmx issue properly from within > devtmpfs, does anyone? Proposals are always welcome, the last time this > came up a week or so ago, I don't recall seeing any proposals, just a > general complaint. Is it really a problem - devtmpfs is optional. It's a problem for the userspace folks to handle and if they made it mandatory in their code diddums, someone better go fork working versions. Alan