From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the generic clock API available by default
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:27:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121022132711.GE4477@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121022130556.GM21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:02:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > @@ -327,6 +328,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91
> > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> > select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
> > select HAVE_CLK
> > + select HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK
> This is silly. If you select "HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK" then isn't it true that
> "HAVE_CLK" should also be selected? If so, why not have "HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK"
> do that selection and remove it from all these entries?
If we're worrying about that there's the larger point that the effect of
this patch is to make HAVE_CLK meaningless as there will be no platform
for which it's not true. I was just leaving HAVE_CLK alone for now
ready to circle around on it if we ever manage to get the enabling bit
sorted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-22 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-22 13:02 [PATCH] clk: Make the generic clock API available by default Mark Brown
2012-10-22 13:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-22 13:27 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-10-22 13:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-10-22 13:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-22 15:56 ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-23 9:47 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <CAJhJPsV0rnE+K-9bWFy85T36H+PfbibrsGQ_mN_miqttyQJNhw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-10-23 9:22 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-23 9:54 Mark Brown
2012-11-26 21:39 ` Grant Likely
2012-08-28 20:35 Mark Brown
2012-08-29 5:56 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2012-08-29 21:49 ` Stephen Warren
2012-08-30 17:19 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-30 23:40 ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-05 2:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121022132711.GE4477@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).