From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, davem@davemloft.net,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulus@samba.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] tools, perf: Fix up for x86 UAPI disintegration
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:46:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121024194619.GC17945@liondog.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121024184337.GD13993@ghostprotocols.net>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:43:37AM -0700, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:55:58PM +0100, David Howells escreveu:
> >
> > Here are some potential fix ups for perf and other tools. They need to be
> > applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
>
> Borislav, Namhyung, can you take a look at this series?
Sure.
David, where can get that x86 UAPI disintegration patch?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > There are five patches:
> >
> > (1) Use a makefile $(call ...) function in tools/Makefile to make it easier
> > to deal with.
> >
> > [NOTE! I think the rule for selftests_install is wrong since it attempts
> > to discard '_clean' from the end of the target name instead of
> > '_install']
That's right, it should be "...testing/$(@:_install=)" instead. Good catch.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 16:55 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] tools, perf: Fix up for x86 UAPI disintegration David Howells
2012-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] tools: Define a Makefile function to do subdir processing David Howells
2012-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] tools: Honour the O= flag when tool build called from a higher Makefile David Howells
2012-10-26 5:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf: Make perf build for x86 with UAPI disintegration applied David Howells
2012-10-26 5:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Disintegrate asm/svm.h and asm/vmx.h to produce UAPI components for perf David Howells
2012-10-19 16:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: UAPI Disintegrate asm/perf_regs.h David Howells
2012-10-24 18:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] tools, perf: Fix up for x86 UAPI disintegration Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-10-24 19:46 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-10-25 7:57 ` David Howells
2012-10-26 4:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-10-26 6:04 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121024194619.GC17945@liondog.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).