From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935545Ab2JXUTe (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:19:34 -0400 Received: from mx.scalarmail.ca ([98.158.95.75]:29190 "EHLO ironport-01.sms.scalar.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935521Ab2JXUTa (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:19:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:19:28 -0400 From: Nick Bowler To: Josh Cartwright Cc: Arnd Bergmann , arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Linn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] zynq: move static peripheral mappings Message-ID: <20121024201928.GA31069@elliptictech.com> References: <20121022211219.GC31538@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com> <201210231450.11540.arnd@arndb.de> <20121023162641.GG20593@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com> <20121023202703.GA16912@elliptictech.com> <20121023234219.GM20593@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121023234219.GM20593@beefymiracle.amer.corp.natinst.com> Organization: Elliptic Technologies Inc. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2012-10-23 18:42 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 04:27:03PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > Just FYI, I sent a patch to fix the same bug a while back > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1156361/ > > > > together with other patches to fix early printk on the ZC702 serial > > console. Admittedly, I dropped the ball on these as other issues > > came up so I was away from the Zynq for a while. > > > > However, I'm now getting back on the Zynq and have a bunch of patches to > > make it all work on the ZC702 board. I've respun the ZC702 early boot > > fixes against newer git but they're obviously going to conflict with > > this series. Should I resend them anyway? > > If you have other fixes for the zc702, that'd be great. Most of my > testing has been in a qemu model; I haven't had a chance to try getting > the zc702 booting yet. > > The first stumbling block is that it looks like the secondary uart is > the primary uart on the zc702. Yes, that is indeed the case, and was what I tried to address with my earlier patches. > > I also have a DT binding for the TTC driver, I can send that. > > That'd be great! OK, I will respin and test this stuff on top of your v4 series and send them out. Cheers, -- Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)