From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161464Ab2JXW27 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:28:59 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:63285 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161356Ab2JXW25 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:28:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:28:54 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Omar Ramirez Luna Cc: Victor Manuel Jaquez Leal , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] staging: tidspbridge fixes for 3.7 Message-ID: <20121024222854.GA1891@kroah.com> References: <1351116560-6918-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@copitl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1351116560-6918-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@copitl.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:09:14PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: > With 3.7-rc1 changes: > > - New irq numbering in OMAP3 broke the driver request for a mmu irq, > until this is migrated to the common iommu framework we can only > hardcode the new number. > - _raw_* accessors changed a type of one of their parameters with patch > "195bbca ARM: 7500/1: io: avoid writeback addressing modes for > __raw_ accessors", so the build system was filled with warnings from > the old parameter usage. > > Omar Ramirez Luna (6): > staging: tidspbridge: request the right irq for mmu > staging: tidspbridge: drop const from custom mmu implementation > staging: tidspbridge: change type to __iomem for per and core > addresses > staging: tidspbridge: ioremap dsp sync addr > staging: tidspbridge: ioremap physical address of the stack segment > in shm > staging: tidspbridge: delete unused mmu functions Are the "fix up the compiler warning" patches really needed for 3.7? Are they new in 3.7-rc1? Or were they there before in 3.6? thanks, greg k-h