Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] Remove VLAIS usage from gadget code

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1648 bytes --]

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:33:20AM -0400, Behan Webster wrote:
> On 12-10-31 09:28 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >hi,
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 05:18:56PM -0400, Behan Webster wrote:
> >>The use of variable length arrays in structs (VLAIS) in the Linux Kernel code
> >>precludes the use of compilers which don't implement VLAIS (for instance the
> >>Clang compiler). This patch instead calculates offsets into the kmalloc-ed
> >>memory buffer using macros from valign.h.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>
> >this won't apply after the current cleanups I applied to gadget code
> >from Sebastian.
> Makes sense. I'll try it with your repo, and regenerate.
> 
> >If someone takes this patch, it will generate a series of annoying,
> >hard-to-figure-out conflicts (at least judging by the looks of
> >$SUBJECT).
> I just tried the patch on your git.kernel.org repo and thankfully
> there is only one hunk which is rejected, and fortunately the reason
> is trivial (descriptors -> fs_descriptors).
> 
> Was:
> -        func->function.descriptors = data->fs_descs;
> +        func->function.descriptors = fs_descs;
> 
> Now is:
> -        func->function.fs_descriptors = data->fs_descs;
> +        func->function.fs_descriptors = fs_descs;
> 
> I will regenerate the patch set, but obviously the new gadget patch
> in the V3 patchset will only apply to the USB repo, and not to the
> netfilter repo.

then we can merge to net tree and handle the conflicts when merging to
Linus, that'd be fine by me as long as people know how to solve the
conflict properly ;-)

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]