From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753639Ab2KKS1u (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 11 Nov 2012 13:27:50 -0500
Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:47633 "EHLO
	lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753515Ab2KKS1s (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 11 Nov 2012 13:27:48 -0500
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:32:43 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@sfconservancy.org>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>,
        "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
        target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Marc Fleischmann <mwf@risingtidesystems.com>,
        Nicholas Bellinger <nab@risingtidesystems.com>
Subject: Re: scsi target, likely GPL violation
Message-ID: <20121111183243.62602d9b@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1352658157.6524.58.camel@dabdike>
References: <509A915B.30105@redhat.com>
	<1352626456.6524.46.camel@dabdike>
	<20121111130553.GA30943@thunk.org>
	<87390gxjbd.fsf@ebb.org>
	<1352658157.6524.58.camel@dabdike>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEWysKsSBQMIAwIZCwj///8wIhxoRDXH9QHCAAABeUlEQVQ4jaXTvW7DIBAAYCQTzz2hdq+rdg494ZmBeE5KYHZjm/d/hJ6NfzBJpp5kRb5PHJwvMPMk2L9As5Y9AmYRBL+HAyJKeOU5aHRhsAAvORQ+UEgAvgddj/lwAXndw2laEDqA4x6KEBhjYRCg9tBFCOuJFxg2OKegbWjbsRTk8PPhKPD7HcRxB7cqhgBRp9Dcqs+B8v4CQvFdqeot3Kov6hBUn0AJitrzY+sgUuiA8i0r7+B3AfqKcN6t8M6HtqQ+AOoELCikgQSbgabKaJW3kn5lBs47JSGDhhLKDUh1UMipwwinMYPTBuIBjEclSaGZUk9hDlTb5sUTYN2SFFQuPe4Gox1X0FZOufjgBiV1Vls7b+GvK3SU4wfmcGo9rPPQzgIabfj4TYQo15k3bTHX9RIw/kniir5YbtJF4jkFG+dsDK1IgE413zAthU/vR2HVMmFUPIHTvF6jWCpFaGw/A3qWgnbxpSm9MSmY5b3pM1gvNc/gQfwBsGwF0VCtxZgAAAAASUVORK5CYII=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> >      1. Yes, I've got first hand proof of a GPL violation (in which case
> >         we'll then move to seeing how we can remedy this) or
> >      2. A genuine public apology for the libel, which I'll do my best to
> >         prevail on RTS to accept.
> > 
> > Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of this
> > nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.
> 
> That asks for moderation until we have a better investigation of the
> facts.  It definitely doesn't try to prejudge them or express preference
> for a specific outcome as your misquote makes out.

So how can you demand a public apology for libel or instant first hand
proof and now claim you just wanted moderation ? It's not hard to see why
your position was misinterpreted ?

Alan