From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753322Ab2KLOKz (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:10:55 -0500 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:48582 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751508Ab2KLOKx (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:10:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:15:38 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: "Bradley M. Kuhn" , James Bottomley , Andy Grover , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , target-devel , linux-scsi , linux-kernel , Marc Fleischmann , Nicholas Bellinger Subject: Re: scsi target, likely GPL violation Message-ID: <20121112141538.19c90be8@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20121112140843.GC4895@thunk.org> References: <509A915B.30105@redhat.com> <1352626456.6524.46.camel@dabdike> <20121111130553.GA30943@thunk.org> <87390gxjbd.fsf@ebb.org> <20121112140843.GC4895@thunk.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:08:43 -0500 "Theodore Ts'o" wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:15:02AM -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > > Andy's initial email ended with the request: "Please explain." Thus, > > Andy's email seemed designed to seek facts, which I think is a > > reasonable and good thing to do here. Meanwhile, the facts *still* > > aren't clear here yet. > > ... and the statement, "When did you stop beating your wife?" is also > a request for information? Ted can you explain what this has to do with the original discussion ?