From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161062Ab2KNJt3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:49:29 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:24249 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161051Ab2KNJtW (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:49:22 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,249,1352102400"; d="scan'208";a="168193394" Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:52:32 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linus.walleij@linaro.org, khali@linux-fr.org, Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 rev 2] Centralized parsing of ACPI device resources Message-ID: <20121114095232.GN31759@intel.com> References: <1351928793-14375-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <2429141.J1r7BIpiiT@vostro.rjw.lan> <5953163.ZajFIHZXph@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5953163.ZajFIHZXph@vostro.rjw.lan> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:51:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Updated series, taking the Mika's feedback into account, follows. There are > bug fixes in [1/3], [2/3] is unchanged and the new [3/3] is a replacement, done > in a different way because of some ACPICA limitations I didn't realize before. I've now tested this series on my ACPI 5 enabled test machine and everything works fine - I can see the platform devices and that they have the ACPI handle attached. For the whole series, Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg Tested-by: Mika Westerberg (testing has been limited on one ACPI 5 machine, though). I guess I can start preparing the GPIO/SPI/I2C patches soon ;-)