From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2993171Ab2KOIum (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 03:50:42 -0500 Received: from eu1sys200aog109.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.127]:56810 "EHLO eu1sys200aog109.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992717Ab2KOIui (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 03:50:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:19:00 +0530 From: Srinidhi Kasagar To: , Cc: , , , Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout Message-ID: <20121115084858.GA29668@bnru10> References: <1352222317.15558.1584.camel@cliu38-desktop-build> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [...] > From: Chuansheng Liu > Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM > Subject: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout > To: linus.walleij@linaro.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com > > > > The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always > >= 0 with unsigned int type. > > So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless. > > Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c | 14 -------------- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c > index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c > @@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags) > timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout( > &dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout); > > - if (timeout < 0) { > - dev_err(&dev->adev->dev, > - "wait_for_completion_timeout " > - "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout); > - status = timeout; > - } > - No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout. It is used further in nmk_i2c_xfer_one. You could perhaps use if (timeout == 0) { ...and the rest of the code as is } regards/srinidhi