From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751864Ab2KUFQh (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:16:37 -0500 Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:53254 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750791Ab2KUFQg (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:16:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:16:33 +0900 From: Simon Horman To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mundt , Magnus Damm , Linus Walleij , Kuninori Morimoto , Phil Edworthy , Nobuhiro Iwamatsu Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/42] ARM: shmobile: Register PFC platform device Message-ID: <20121121051633.GF6570@verge.net.au> References: <1353464863-10281-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <1353464863-10281-12-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1353464863-10281-12-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Organisation: Horms Solutions Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 03:27:12AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Add arch code to register the PFC platform device instead of calling the > driver directly. Platform device registration in the sh-pfc driver will > be removed. I'm not really sure that I understand the motivation for moving platform device registration from the driver into mach-shmobile. Could you explain this a little?