From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755375Ab2KUQxu (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:53:50 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38123 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755330Ab2KUQxt (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:53:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:53:42 +0000 From: Mel Gorman To: Peter Zijlstra , Andrea Arcangeli , Ingo Molnar Cc: Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Hugh Dickins , Thomas Gleixner , Paul Turner , Lee Schermerhorn , Alex Shi , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux-MM , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4 Message-ID: <20121121165342.GH8218@suse.de> References: <1353493312-8069-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1353493312-8069-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest > schednuma figures I have available. > Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202 I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with 1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as tip/sched/core from the time I last pulled patches as posted on the list patches posted since which are x86/vsyscall: Add Kconfig option to use native vsyscalls, switch to it mm/migration: Improve migrate_misplaced_page() mm, numa: Turn 4K pte NUMA faults into effective hugepage ones x86/mm: Don't flush the TLB on #WP pmd fixups 2. autonuma + native THP support porte by Hugh 3. balancenuma with a missing THP migration bit for memcg If all goes according to plan it'll do a pair of runs -- one with oprofile and one without in case there are profile-related questions. Hopefully they'll be collected correctly and usable. I'm not using perf simply because I do not have the necessary automation in place. I had kept oprofile automation in place when it was important that I could run identical tests on older kernels. I did not just pull the tip tree for schednuma because it would not be a like-like comparison with the other trees. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs