linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: pi futex oops in __lock_acquire
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:46:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121121174655.GA25392@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50AD1164.2000904@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:37:40AM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
 > I've sent a patch to address this. It has now been running "trinity -c
 > futex" for about 12 hours. I haven't seen any more futex failures

Looks good here too.

 > but I
 > have seen a few OOMs. Is that expected from trinity?

Yeah, seems there's some leaks (both in trinity and the kernel).
Oddly enough someone else emailed me about that this morning, which
prompted me to write up this: http://codemonkey.org.uk/2012/11/21/fuzz-testing-oom-killer/
Which is just part of the problem. There are other issues too it seems. Fun.

	Dave


      reply	other threads:[~2012-11-21 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-18  1:53 MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES too low (called from ioc_release_fn) Dave Jones
2012-10-18  5:53 ` Jens Axboe
2012-10-19  5:21   ` Dave Jones
2012-10-19 12:49     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 19:29       ` Dave Jones
2012-10-23 19:50       ` MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES too low Dave Jones
2012-10-24 20:24         ` pi futex oops in __lock_acquire Dave Jones
2012-10-25  4:44           ` Darren Hart
2012-10-25 11:09             ` Dave Jones
2012-11-20 16:46             ` Dave Jones
2012-11-20 17:27               ` Darren Hart
2012-11-20 23:10               ` Darren Hart
2012-11-21  0:30                 ` Darren Hart
2012-11-21 17:37                   ` Darren Hart
2012-11-21 17:46                     ` Dave Jones [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121121174655.GA25392@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).