From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755770Ab2KVSrx (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:47:53 -0500 Received: from smtprelay-h22.telenor.se ([195.54.99.197]:50314 "EHLO smtprelay-h22.telenor.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753911Ab2KVSru (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:47:50 -0500 X-SENDER-IP: [85.230.29.114] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AglUAD1srlBV5h1yPGdsb2JhbABEhT0iAbwwFwMBAQEBHxkNJ4IeAQEEATocEwEPEAgDRhQlChoTiAcKCMAtBBSQE2EDlgCFe404 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,303,1352070000"; d="scan'208";a="230548036" From: "Henrik Rydberg" Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 19:23:25 +0100 To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Henrik Rydberg , Linus Torvalds , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 3.7-rc6 Message-ID: <20121122182325.GA777@polaris.bitmath.org> References: <20121120103905.GA3908@polaris.bitmath.org> <20121122111825.GA7188@polaris.bitmath.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Daniel, > >> My apologies for the long delay in answering, I've somehow mixed up > >> different bugreports and thought I've sent you a patch to test > >> already. Anyway, please test > >> > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1728111/ > > > > Tested-by: Henrik Rydberg > > Can you please boot with drm.debug=0xe added to your kernel cmdline > with that patch applied and attach the full dmesg? Are you looking for something in particular? The patch obviously works because edp_bpp is never set. The reason seems to be [ 1.634759] [drm:intel_parse_bios], VBT signature missing In the source, a few lines above that message, we have something that looks suspciciously like an off-by-one error: /* Scour memory looking for the VBT signature */ for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i++) { If that matters or not, I do not know. Any more tests would have to wait until tomorrow. Thanks, Henrik