From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754548Ab2KZL4Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 06:56:24 -0500 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:57790 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754136Ab2KZL4W (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 06:56:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:56:19 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: "Hebbar, Gururaja" Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tony@atomide.com, lrg@ti.com, perex@perex.cz, nsekhar@ti.com, sudhakar.raj@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, rob@landley.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: Davinci: machine: Add device tree binding Message-ID: <20121126115619.GF9411@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1353557099-21599-1-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> <1353557099-21599-3-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0hHDr/TIsw4o3iPK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1353557099-21599-3-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> X-Cookie: Chess tonight. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --0hHDr/TIsw4o3iPK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 09:34:59AM +0530, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: > +- dai-data : A list of DAI data used by SOC code to register > + DAI, Codecs platform. > + The string index "should" be as shown below. > +dai-data = > +"", "", > +"", "", > +""; This continues to have the same issue as with previous versions, this is all Linux internals (especially the evm_aic3x_init thing) not a description of the hardware, there's not enough information to allow someone to work out what the bindings for their system should be. Do not post *ANY* further versions that have this evm_aic3x_init stuff in them, it's very annoying that you keep on ignoring this feedback. --0hHDr/TIsw4o3iPK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQs1jbAAoJELSic+t+oim9DmwP/AsAL9pNXNxmU/aCTCVHv1Kz YFXb5dBpofd2qcbloEoLvYeZS0QWs8fdJYrplmKd57jZM5/ltBhm443fs6ltQ+vE AFlIpDktosTZTvjk8LcDh3IVB1zstGglXJFnb4a2ceFPq+Qee5w0em0cigotNWfY BadAv5gLDbhCKbg2XMrQU6Npv1bE79eAOu+4LTyrPieUtK/97Yncjd+nFZCrigr4 R7Oa5usgW94HQaWVzKajboOHQLSiYlkksmuSV6s5E89QVvmLV5eG08O9Vxlmc7ix bwHl404B2t2OeUS6L40M12PrdqQ03nZJNkzOLgdrl/mAitCEPse0rOjGn46udUKy VWUHczmETZc2Dp8ybgBr647iIPl1gQKy/um6c4V4h/og7MZwBK+i7yKj7NqFGdrN hHIvQpEVpbSwbS6w+iGO5nwNu7qSRQGt80zHqeVTmg5ztbmHcELJ+7OGBtrp6VhF nwPVkkJw4Q3w4G/Ui8uIN5sJJ6GefWop7R3NsZsljGKZkNWHj5gNW60YQsP90KBE bjdXdUIN1Ofb0D4B6/x35yp8ETZ5myOVO8kMOPTMLteY46z2ZO0QUms2hR5RYQI0 nUZ5AQAuzGOFLjME/0e+rqNCLOT87Uemag9T8DkDgixwv8RABGkegqlqLdcRkpN3 8o0zXlSXwpt/L8SF4hx5 =OcxI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0hHDr/TIsw4o3iPK--