From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754389Ab2LCL5R (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 06:57:17 -0500 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([80.244.247.6]:40310 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751091Ab2LCL5P (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 06:57:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:57:06 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Behan Webster , davem@davemloft.net, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] Remove VLAIS usage from gadget code Message-ID: <20121203115706.GA4760@breakpoint.cc> References: <1351631937-21455-1-git-send-email-behanw@converseincode.com> <1351631937-21455-3-git-send-email-behanw@converseincode.com> <20121031132838.GQ10998@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <509144C0.8000601@converseincode.com> <20121101072116.GA32013@arwen.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121101072116.GA32013@arwen.pp.htv.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:21:16AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > then we can merge to net tree and handle the conflicts when merging to > Linus, that'd be fine by me as long as people know how to solve the > conflict properly ;-) Felipe please drop this patch. I don't like this VLAIS patch and its macro magic. I support the goal of compiling the kernel with clang but I don't think that this is appropriate. Davem has also his problems with the netfilter part so I am no the only one. *I* think the gadget part of the kernel is something most people won't use so it won't show up. Anyway, please drop this completely I try to think of something sane. Sebastian