From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932505Ab2LFWuX (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 17:50:23 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59530 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932461Ab2LFWuW (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 17:50:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:50:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] remove vm_struct list management Message-Id: <20121206145020.93fd7128.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1354810175-4338-1-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> References: <1354810175-4338-1-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 01:09:27 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > I'm not sure that "7/8: makes vmlist only for kexec" is fine. > Because it is related to userspace program. > As far as I know, makedumpfile use kexec's output information and it only > need first address of vmalloc layer. So my implementation reflect this > fact, but I'm not sure. And now, I don't fully test this patchset. > Basic operation work well, but I don't test kexec. So I send this > patchset with 'RFC'. Yes, this is irritating. Perhaps Vivek or one of the other kexec people could take a look at this please - if would obviously be much better if we can avoid merging [patch 7/8] at all.