From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756367Ab2LGPCm (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:02:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:49328 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752586Ab2LGPCl (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:02:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 07:04:48 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: =?iso-8859-1?B?IkphbiBILiBTY2j2bmhlcnIi?= Cc: Joe Perches , Andrew Morton , Kay Sievers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] printk() fixes, optimizations, and clean ups Message-ID: <20121207150448.GC20369@kroah.com> References: <1354813571-11253-1-git-send-email-schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20121206133907.37c255e9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1354837050.22463.4.camel@joe-AO722> <20121206161943.78633125.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1354848669.22463.23.camel@joe-AO722> <50C1D758.1080007@cs.tu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <50C1D758.1080007@cs.tu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 12:47:36PM +0100, "Jan H. Schönherr" wrote: > Am 07.12.2012 03:51, schrieb Joe Perches: > > On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:19 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:37:30 -0800 > >> Joe Perches wrote: > >>> Can you please pick this up for -next now and I'll > >>> redo my patches against -next for -rc1 so I'm not > >>> delayed until 3.9? > >> > >> It would be better to do things in the other order. > >> > >> a) Your patches perform mainly code-movement which doesn't cause > >> functional changes. Jan's patches are functional changes which > >> require more thought and testing and possible fixups. > > > > Fine by me. Jan? > > No problem. > > I agree with Andrew, that patches 9 to 14 could use indeed some > more eyeballs. > > Patches 1 to 8 are more straight-forward, and I would consider > these ready. However, they are also those, where I probably won't > have any trouble rebasing them on top of your changes. > > > Anyway. Until now I always thought my patches will end up in the > queue of some maintainer, so that I don't have to bother about > _when_ posting my patches. Therefore: when should I repost a > version rebased on top of Joe's changes? You are correct, I'll end up queuing these up to my tree when 3.8-rc1 is out, they will live in linux-next until 3.8-final is out, and then go to Linus for 3.9-rc1. Right now, my trees are frozen due to the merge window about to open up. Your patience is appreciated. thanks, greg k-h