From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932238Ab2LRPrZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:47:25 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34093 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932088Ab2LRPrX (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:47:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:47:10 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Stephane Eranian , Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] perf ui/hist: Add support for event group view Message-ID: <20121218154710.GN1283@krava.brq.redhat.com> References: <1355726345-29553-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1355726345-29553-8-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1355726345-29553-8-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 03:38:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > From: Namhyung Kim > > Show group members' overhead also when showing the leader's if event > group is enabled. Use macro for defining hpp functions which looks > almost identical. SNIP > - > -static int hpp__color_overhead_us(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused, > - struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he) > +static int __hpp__percent_fmt(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he, > + u64 (*get_field)(struct hist_entry *), > + const char *fmt, hpp_snprint_fn print_fn) it's hard to tell from diff, but the function looks like this (group part): if (symbol_conf.event_group) { int prev_idx, idx_delta, i; struct perf_evsel *evsel = hists_to_evsel(hists); struct hist_entry *pair; int nr_members = evsel->nr_members; if (nr_members <= 1) return ret; prev_idx = perf_evsel__group_idx(evsel); list_for_each_entry(pair, &he->pairs.head, pairs.node) { u64 period = get_field(pair); u64 total = pair->hists->stats.total_period; if (!total) continue; evsel = hists_to_evsel(pair->hists); idx_delta = perf_evsel__group_idx(evsel) - prev_idx - 1; for (i = 0; i < idx_delta; i++) { ret += print_fn(hpp->buf + ret, hpp->size - ret, fmt, 0.0); } ret += print_fn(hpp->buf + ret, hpp->size - ret, fmt, 100.0 * period / total); prev_idx += 1 + idx_delta; } idx_delta = nr_members - prev_idx - 1; for (i = 0; i < idx_delta; i++) { ret += print_fn(hpp->buf + ret, hpp->size - ret, fmt, 0.0); } } The temporary array (initial send) was more clear to me.. but if this is the preffered way I wont object, since this is another place that would benefit from hist_entries array linking.. when (and if) there's ever patch for that ;-) I think this code now suffers from mischosen data layer jirka