From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@gmail.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: protect against concurrent vma expansion
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:49:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130104024935.GF4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357260005.4930.6.camel@kernel.cn.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:40:05PM -0600, Simon Jeons wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 19:01 -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > One question.
> > >
> > > I found that mainly callsite of expand_stack() is #PF, but it holds
> > > mmap_sem each time before call expand_stack(), how can hold a *shared*
> > > mmap_sem happen?
> >
> > the #PF handler calls down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) before calling expand_stack.
> >
> > I think I'm just confusing you with my terminology; shared lock ==
> > read lock == several readers might hold it at once (I'd say they share
> > it)
>
> Sorry for my late response.
>
> Since expand_stack() will modify vma, then why hold a read lock here?
To prevent that vma being ripped out.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-04 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-01 6:56 [PATCH] mm: protect against concurrent vma expansion Michel Lespinasse
2012-12-03 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-04 0:35 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-12-04 0:43 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-04 14:48 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-12-20 1:56 ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-20 3:01 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-01-04 0:40 ` Simon Jeons
2013-01-04 0:50 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-01-04 1:18 ` Simon Jeons
2013-01-04 2:49 ` Al Viro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130104024935.GF4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.jeons@gmail.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).