From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756040Ab3A0T5f (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:57:35 -0500 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([129.241.93.19]:40662 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755894Ab3A0T5c (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:57:32 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:57:14 +0100 From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt To: Matthias Brugger Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen , Al Viro , Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" , David Howells , Dave Jones , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: avr32: add dummy syscalls Message-ID: <20130127195714.GA11224@samfundet.no> References: <1359291015-4544-1-git-send-email-matthias.bgg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1359291015-4544-1-git-send-email-matthias.bgg@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Around Sun 27 Jan 2013 13:50:15 +0100 or thereabout, Matthias Brugger wrote: > This patch adds dummy syscalls so that compiling > for this architecture does not provoke warnings when > checksyscalls.sh is called. Does any of these syscalls take more than 5 arguments? If so, it is also needed to do some stack handling. I would rather not add syscalls that cause the kernel to misbehave. > Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger > --- > arch/avr32/include/asm/unistd.h | 2 +- > arch/avr32/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/avr32/kernel/syscall_table.S | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- mvh Hans-Christian Egtvedt