On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:54:01AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi Balbi, > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > Hi Kishon, > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:51 AM, kishon wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> On Thursday 31 January 2013 09:08 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:00:37PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Felipe, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 08:53:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Moreover, SoCs having multiple dwc3 controllers will have multiple > >>>>>>>> PHYs, which eventually be added using usb_add_phy_dev(), and not > >>>>>>>> using usb_add_phy(). So each dwc3 controller won't be able to > >>>>>>>> get PHYs by simply calling devm_usb_get_phy() also. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No. We have added usb_get_phy_dev() for that purpose in the case of > >>>>>>> non-dt. > >>>>>>> I think, instead you can have a patch to use devm_usb_get_phy_dev() > >>>>>>> here and > >>>>>>> in exynos platform specific code use usb_bind_phy() to bind the phy > >>>>>>> and > >>>>>>> controller till you change it to dt. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We have dt support for dwc3-exynos, in such case we should go ahead > >>>>>> with > >>>>>> of_platform_populate(), right ? > >>>>>> But if when i use of_platform_populate() i will not be able to set > >>>>>> dma_mask to dwc3->dev. :-( > >> > >> > >> You can do something like this > >> > >> static u64 dwc3_exynos_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32); > >> > >> static int dwc3_exynos_set_dmamask(struct device *dev, void *c) > >> { > >> dev->dma_mask = &dwc3_exynos_dma_mask; > >> > >> return 0; > >> } > >> > >> And in your probe after of_platform_populate, you can add > >> > >> device_for_each_child(&pdev->dev, NULL, dwc3_exynos_set_dmamask); > >> > >> Here pdev is the platform device of dwc3-exynos. By this way all the > >> children of dwc3-exynos will have dma_mask set to the required value. > >> > > > > Nice idea, thanks :-) > > hmm.. so i can patch this now, and get things working ;-) > > > > If this is fine with you shall i go ahead and post a patch for the same ? ;-) should be fine, but we can wait a bit to see if DeviceTree folks reply, your patch will only go on v3.10 anyway. cheers -- balbi