From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754355Ab3BDRLh (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:11:37 -0500 Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:51666 "EHLO mail-vb0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754240Ab3BDRLe (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:11:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:11:28 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, skinsbursky@parallels.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, jmorris@namei.org, axboe@kernel.dk Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] idr: implement idr_alloc() and convert existing users Message-ID: <20130204171128.GL27963@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1359854463-2538-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20130203170241.GA24778@fieldses.org> <20130204001557.GB24778@fieldses.org> <20130204171031.GK27963@mtj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130204171031.GK27963@mtj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:10:31AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > Yeah, that should be easily convertable to the new interface. How > should we route these changes? Your patch can go through the usual > nfs channel and the conversion and deprecation patches can be held off > until after -rc1. Does that sound okay? Ooh, BTW, the cyclic allocation is broken. It's prone to -ENOSPC after the first wraparound. There are several cyclic users in the kernel and I think it probably would be best to implement cyclic support in idr. Thanks. -- tejun