From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
chao.bi@intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
cxie4@marvell.com, ytang5@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] spi/pxa2xx: break out the private DMA API usage into a separate file
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:15:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130205061514.GO20771@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZyH-1SfFFaj_YMt4dcN1c9Y6Uy1iZrzHqqqt8o_AgMLw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:43:42PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > The PXA SPI driver uses PXA platform specific private DMA implementation
> > which does not work on non-PXA platforms. In order to use this driver on
> > other platforms we break out the private DMA implementation into a separate
> > file that gets compiled only when CONFIG_SPI_PXA2XX_PXADMA is set. The DMA
> > functions are stubbed out if there is no DMA implementation selected (i.e
> > we are building on non-PXA platform).
> >
> > While we are there we can kill the dummy DMA bits in pxa2xx_spi.h as they
> > are not needed anymore for CE4100.
> >
> > Once this is done we can add the generic DMA engine support to the driver
> > that allows usage of any DMA controller that implements DMA engine API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > This patch was already acked by Linus W but since I changed this by
> > breaking out the PXA private implementation into a separate file, I'm
> > hoping to get new ack from him ;-)
>
> Sorry for the long delay. This is a nice and clean cut.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-05 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 10:26 [PATCH v3 00/10] spi/pxa2xx: add Intel Lynxpoint SPI controller support Mika Westerberg
2013-01-22 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] spi/pxa2xx: allow building on a 64-bit kernel Mika Westerberg
2013-01-26 7:21 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-22 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] spi/pxa2xx: fix warnings when compiling " Mika Westerberg
2013-01-26 7:22 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-22 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] spi/pxa2xx: convert to the pump message infrastructure Mika Westerberg
2013-01-26 7:23 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-22 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] spi/pxa2xx: convert to the common clk framework Mika Westerberg
2013-01-26 7:23 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-22 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] spi/pxa2xx: break out the private DMA API usage into a separate file Mika Westerberg
2013-02-04 19:43 ` Linus Walleij
2013-02-05 6:15 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-02-08 12:13 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-22 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] spi/pxa2xx: add support for DMA engine Mika Westerberg
2013-02-04 19:46 ` Linus Walleij
2013-02-08 12:13 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-22 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] spi/pxa2xx: add support for runtime PM Mika Westerberg
2013-02-08 12:14 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-22 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] spi/pxa2xx: add support for SPI_LOOP Mika Westerberg
2013-02-08 12:14 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-22 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] spi/pxa2xx: add support for Intel Low Power Subsystem SPI Mika Westerberg
2013-02-08 13:14 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-22 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] spi/pxa2xx: add support for Lynxpoint SPI controllers Mika Westerberg
2013-02-08 13:16 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <CACb1VKtD+pc5cAJAqBg82uCXH_icm9fk1yLB_UnwmEq4Lq-NVQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-02-01 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] spi/pxa2xx: add Intel Lynxpoint SPI controller support Mika Westerberg
2013-02-04 9:45 ` Mark Brown
2013-02-04 9:52 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-02-08 21:37 ` Linus Walleij
2013-02-09 3:43 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-02-08 7:34 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130205061514.GO20771@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=chao.bi@intel.com \
--cc=cxie4@marvell.com \
--cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ytang5@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).