From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757898Ab3BFSTT (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:19:19 -0500 Received: from smtp1.goneo.de ([212.90.139.80]:64038 "EHLO smtp1.goneo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757744Ab3BFSTQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:19:16 -0500 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.744 From: Lars Poeschel To: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] misc/at24: distinguish between eeprom and fram chips Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:19:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org References: <201212041758.38600.poeschel@lemonage.de> <201212051043.07460.poeschel@lemonage.de> <20121205164153.GA5011@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20121205164153.GA5011@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201302061919.18501.poeschel@lemonage.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 05 December 2012 at 17:41:53, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > The method of accessing EEPROMs is used by way more chips than FRAMs. > > > So, I'd prefer to have the text updated more generic like "EEPROMs and > > > similar devices like RAMs, ROMs, etc...". Describing setting .flags in > > > Kconfig is overkill. > > > > A patch updating Kconfig is below. > > Looks good from a glimpse, will apply it later. Hello Wolfram, what happend to this one ? It was a patch updating Kconfig help for at24. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1840591/ Regards, Lars