From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754589Ab3BKJkh (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:40:37 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]:40252 "EHLO mail-ee0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751666Ab3BKJkg (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:40:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:40:32 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mike Travis Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dimitri Sivanich Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] x86, UV: UV3 Check current gru hub support. Message-ID: <20130211094032.GD23932@gmail.com> References: <20130208184305.132404589@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> <20130208184306.212373913@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130208184306.212373913@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mike Travis wrote: > This patch checks current hub support to avoid panicing the > system until all the GRU changes for UV3+ are in place. > > Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis That's a weird signoff sequence. It should either also include a From: Dimitri tag at the front, or the Signed-off-by should be Acked-by. Please also use consistent titles in your patches, standardizing on this pattern would be nice: x86/UV/UV3: Check current gru hub support while UV patches affecting all UV models would come with a 'x86/UV:' title or so. Thanks, Ingo