linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a property
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:28:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212172807.AAF993E0B53@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511A08D2.6010104@gaisler.com>

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:18:10 +0100, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
> On 2013-02-11 00:58, Grant Likely wrote:
> > This patch creates of_count_phandle_with_args(), a new function for
> > counting the number of phandle+argument tuples in a given property. This
> > is better than the existing method of parsing each phandle individually
> > until parsing fails which is a horribly slow way to do the count.
> >
> > It also converts of_gpio_named_count() to use the new function instead
> > of using the above described horrible method.
> >
> > This also requires the return value of of_gpio_count() &
> > of_gpio_named_count() from 'unsigned int' to 'int' so that it can return
> > an error code. All the users of that function are fixed up to correctly
> > handle a negative return value.
> 
> One more thing: In of_spi_register_master() in drivers/spi.c the error 
> code is put in the unsigned variable nb, leading to a huge nb and 
> master->num_chipselect with following problems when of_gpio_named_count 
> returns an error code.

Also a good catch. Fixed.

g.


      reply	other threads:[~2013-02-12 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-10 23:58 [PATCH] of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a property Grant Likely
2013-02-11 11:26 ` Andreas Larsson
2013-02-12 17:25   ` Grant Likely
2013-02-12  9:18 ` Andreas Larsson
2013-02-12 17:28   ` Grant Likely [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130212172807.AAF993E0B53@localhost \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).