linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
	"Eran Ben-Avi" <benavi@marvell.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
	Maen Suleiman <maen@marvell.com>,
	Shadi Ammouri <shadi@marvell.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/32] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:36:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201302122236.37491.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130212195816.6e34b3ce@skate>

On Tuesday 12 February 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Any driver that requires a
> > linear mapping of I/O ports to __iomem pointers must depend
> > CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT with the current definition of that symbol (as
> > mentioned before, we should really rename that to
> > CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP). Having these functions not defined is a
> > compile time check that is necessary to ensure that all drivers have
> > the correct annotation.
> 
> I have the feeling that the problem is more complex than that. My
> understanding is that the pcim_iomap_regions() function used by
> drivers/ata/libata-sff.c can perfectly be used to map memory BARs, and
> not necessarily I/O BARs. Therefore, this driver can perfectly be used
> in an architecture where CONFIG_NO_IOPORT is selected.

That is correct.

> The thing is that pcim_iomap_regions() transparently allows to remap an
> I/O BAR is such a BAR is passed as argument, or a memory BAR if such a
> BAR is passed as argument.
> 
> Therefore, I continue to believe that the pcim_*() functions are useful
> even if the platform doesn't have CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT.

Yes, the pcim_ functions are useful in principle, but it falls back
to the __pci_ioport_map() for IORESOURCE_IO, and that needs to
return an error if CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT is not set.
I think it would be correct if you add this hunk:

diff --git a/lib/pci_iomap.c b/lib/pci_iomap.c
index 0d83ea8..f9b6387 100644
--- a/lib/pci_iomap.c
+++ b/lib/pci_iomap.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen)
                return NULL;
        if (maxlen && len > maxlen)
                len = maxlen;
-       if (flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
+       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) && (flags & IORESOURCE_IO))
                return __pci_ioport_map(dev, start, len);
        if (flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
                if (flags & IORESOURCE_CACHEABLE)

in order to prevent a link error when CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT is unset.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-12 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1360686546-24277-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2013-02-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 05/32] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT Thomas Petazzoni
2013-02-12 18:00   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-12 18:58     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-02-12 22:36       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-03-04 16:28         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-03-04 20:30           ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-06  6:28 Jingoo Han
2013-03-06  8:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-03-06  8:40 Jingoo Han

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201302122236.37491.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=alior@marvell.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=benavi@marvell.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=maen@marvell.com \
    --cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=shadi@marvell.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).