linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH EDAC 07/13] edac: add support for raw error reports
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:41:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130215154123.GH14387@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130215132530.4f3b7dab@redhat.com>

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:25:30PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Well, for sure using an structure will help to avoid missing a
> parameter or exchanging its order. The stack usage won't reduce,
> though, because the structure will keep using the stack.

If you allocate it on the stack of the caller, yes. If you kmalloc it,
no.

In any case, passing a pointer to struct edac_raw_error_desc only will
allow on x86_64 (and i386 AFAICT) to use only registers to pass callee
function arguments. Which is always a win. You probably need to stare at
compiler output to see what gcc actually does with -O2 optimizations.

> As I can't foresee the usage of this function call outside the core
> and by the GHES driver, I'm not sure what would be the better.

Having an error descriptor is always better, even if it were only for
clarity's and simplicity's sake.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-15 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-15 12:44 [PATCH EDAC 00/13] Add a driver to report Firmware first errors (via GHES) Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 01/13] edac: lock module owner to avoid error report conflicts Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 02/13] ghes: move structures/enum to a header file Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 03/13] ghes: add the needed hooks for EDAC error report Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-21  1:26   ` Huang Ying
2013-02-21 12:04     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-22  0:45       ` Huang Ying
2013-02-22  8:50         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-22  8:57           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-25  0:25             ` Huang Ying
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 04/13] edac: add a new memory layer type Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 05/13] ghes_edac: Register at EDAC core the BIOS report Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 06/13] ghes_edac: Allow registering more than once Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 07/13] edac: add support for raw error reports Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 14:13   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-15 15:25     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 15:41       ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-02-15 15:49         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 16:02           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-15 18:20             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-16 16:57               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-17 10:44                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-18 13:52                   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-18 15:24                     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-19 11:56                       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 08/13] ghes_edac: add support for reporting errors via EDAC Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 09/13] ghes_edac: do a better job of filling EDAC DIMM info Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 10/13] edac: better report error conditions in debug mode Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:44 ` [PATCH EDAC 11/13] edac: initialize the core earlier Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:45 ` [PATCH EDAC 12/13] ghes_edac.c: Don't credit the same memory dimm twice Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 12:45 ` [PATCH EDAC 13/13] ghes_edac: Improve driver's printk messages Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-02-15 16:38   ` Joe Perches
2013-02-15 17:33     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130215154123.GH14387@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).