From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753042Ab3BOQuh (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:50:37 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34746 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751337Ab3BOQug (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:50:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:50:32 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Jan Kara , LKML , Frederic Weisbecker , Andrew Morton , jslaby@suse.cz, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "kay.sievers" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] printk: Remove separate printk_sched buffers and use printk buf instead Message-ID: <20130215165032.GF7458@quack.suse.cz> References: <1360112748.2621.25.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130206230220.GA18329@quack.suse.cz> <20130212122245.GB19583@quack.suse.cz> <1360867691.23152.48.camel@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1360867691.23152.48.camel@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 14-02-13 13:48:11, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:22 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > Anyway, what do you guys think about this version? > > Steven, Andrew, did you have a chance to look at my patches? > > Can you resend without being attachments. Patches sent as attachments > seldom get reviewed. Well, for example I do review text/plain attachments but that may count into 'seldom' ;) I'll send them inline. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR