From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755542Ab3BRRDg (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:03:36 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]:58226 "EHLO mail-pb0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753581Ab3BRRDe (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:03:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:03:30 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: Lai Jiangshan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 wq/for-3.9] workqueue: reimplement is_chained_work() using current_wq_worker() Message-ID: <20130218170330.GB17414@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20130214032633.GF9057@htj.dyndns.org> <20130214032705.GG9057@htj.dyndns.org> <511FBCA0.9020205@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <511FBCA0.9020205@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey, Lai. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:06:40AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > Hi, tj > > Thank you for adding this one. > > Would you deffer "workqueue: rename cpu_workqueue to pool_workqueue" > a little? I don't want to rebase my almost-ready work again(not a > good reason... but please...) Sorry about the late reply. Was offline over the weekend. I see that you already updated your patches on top, so I suppose this doesn't matter anymore? Thanks! -- tejun