From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933002Ab3BSOgA (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:36:00 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22410 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932945Ab3BSOf6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:35:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:35:21 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Felipe Balbi , Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Steven Rostedt , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , JBottomley@parallels.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Doug Thompson , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SYSFS "errors" Message-ID: <20130219113521.510db290@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130219135056.GH26623@pd.tnic> References: <20130219101121.GJ23197@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20130219081149.46972f56@redhat.com> <20130219114345.GA26623@pd.tnic> <20130219091610.2b746a30@redhat.com> <20130219123502.GD26623@pd.tnic> <20130219094640.2abf1a66@redhat.com> <20130219130626.GE26623@pd.tnic> <20130219131500.GW23197@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20130219132853.GG26623@pd.tnic> <20130219133809.GA4390@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20130219135056.GH26623@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:50:56 +0100 Borislav Petkov escreveu: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:38:09PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > because changing the permission will cause the same issue: > > Actually, I take that back. Mauro's patch will already create the file > anyway: > > if (mci->set_sdram_scrub_rate || mci->get_sdram_scrub_rate) > > Adjusting the permissions is simply the last missing piece to this patch > to make the interface to userspace 100% coherent. That's covers everything but Hannes arguments. I don't think that adding just one more device_create_file() on a driver that creates dozens (or hundreds) of sys nodes, depending on the number of DIMMS on the system would make it any worse. Regards, Mauro [PATCH EDAC] edac: only create sdram_scrub_rate where supported Currently, sdram_scrub_rate sysfs node is created even if the device doesn't support get/set the scub rate. Change the logic to only create this device node when the operation is supported. Reported-by: Felipe Balbi Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c index 9c58da6..4f4b613 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ * * Written Doug Thompson www.softwarebitmaker.com * - * (c) 2012 - Mauro Carvalho Chehab + * (c) 2012-2013 - Mauro Carvalho Chehab * The entire API were re-written, and ported to use struct device * */ @@ -681,9 +681,6 @@ static ssize_t mci_sdram_scrub_rate_store(struct device *dev, unsigned long bandwidth = 0; int new_bw = 0; - if (!mci->set_sdram_scrub_rate) - return -ENODEV; - if (strict_strtoul(data, 10, &bandwidth) < 0) return -EINVAL; @@ -707,9 +704,6 @@ static ssize_t mci_sdram_scrub_rate_show(struct device *dev, struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev); int bandwidth = 0; - if (!mci->get_sdram_scrub_rate) - return -ENODEV; - bandwidth = mci->get_sdram_scrub_rate(mci); if (bandwidth < 0) { edac_printk(KERN_DEBUG, EDAC_MC, "Error reading scrub rate\n"); @@ -870,8 +864,7 @@ DEVICE_ATTR(ce_count, S_IRUGO, mci_ce_count_show, NULL); DEVICE_ATTR(max_location, S_IRUGO, mci_max_location_show, NULL); /* memory scrubber attribute file */ -DEVICE_ATTR(sdram_scrub_rate, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, mci_sdram_scrub_rate_show, - mci_sdram_scrub_rate_store); +DEVICE_ATTR(sdram_scrub_rate, 0, NULL, NULL); static struct attribute *mci_attrs[] = { &dev_attr_reset_counters.attr, @@ -882,7 +875,6 @@ static struct attribute *mci_attrs[] = { &dev_attr_ce_noinfo_count.attr, &dev_attr_ue_count.attr, &dev_attr_ce_count.attr, - &dev_attr_sdram_scrub_rate.attr, &dev_attr_max_location.attr, NULL }; @@ -1017,6 +1009,22 @@ int edac_create_sysfs_mci_device(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) return err; } + if (mci->set_sdram_scrub_rate || mci->get_sdram_scrub_rate) { + if (mci->get_sdram_scrub_rate) { + dev_attr_sdram_scrub_rate.attr.mode |= S_IRUGO; + dev_attr_sdram_scrub_rate.show = &mci_sdram_scrub_rate_show; + } + if (mci->set_sdram_scrub_rate) { + dev_attr_sdram_scrub_rate.attr.mode |= S_IWUSR; + dev_attr_sdram_scrub_rate.store = &mci_sdram_scrub_rate_store; + } + err = device_create_file(&mci->dev, + &dev_attr_sdram_scrub_rate); + if (err) { + edac_dbg(1, "failure: create sdram_scrub_rate\n"); + goto fail2; + } + } /* * Create the dimm/rank devices */ @@ -1061,6 +1069,7 @@ fail: continue; device_unregister(&dimm->dev); } +fail2: device_unregister(&mci->dev); bus_unregister(&mci->bus); kfree(mci->bus.name); -- Cheers, Mauro