From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.jf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] dw_dmac: introduce generic DMA binding for DT
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:50:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201302200950.26182.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130220080348.GF23302@intel.com>
On Wednesday 20 February 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Since there is still churn, would it make sense if I just revert the SPEAr13xx
> patch (your first patch) and send a pull request to Linus.
> Since there are no users and not much testing has been done, I think we can push
> these to 3.10 via arm-soc/slave-dma tree.
>
> Gives more testing and usage will go along as well.
> Since merge window is open, I would like my pull to go soonish and not churn the
> tree much.
Reverting the SPEAr13xx would definitely help, yes. The reason why I'd also like
to see the second patch get merged is so that we can do the SPEAr changes in 3.10
without having an interdependency between the trees. I tried very hard to
make the patch have a minimal impact on the non-DT code path to avoid regressions.
Maybe you can send your tree now with just the revert applied, and then send the
other one separately next week along with any bug fixes that may have accumulated
by then?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-20 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-15 18:21 [PATCH 0/4] dw_dmac: introduce generic DMA binding for DT Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] Revert "ARM: SPEAr13xx: Pass DW DMAC platform data from DT" Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] dmaengine: dw_dmac: move to generic DMA binding Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-16 3:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-16 10:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-16 10:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-16 13:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-16 11:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-02-16 14:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-16 14:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-02-16 22:21 ` [PATCHv3 " Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-16 22:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-02-16 23:24 ` [PATCHv4 " Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-16 23:28 ` [PATCHv3 " Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-16 22:23 ` [BONUS PATCH] dmaengine: dw_dmac: simplify master selection Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] spi: pl022: use generic DMA slave configuration if possible Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] serial: pl011: " Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-16 3:26 ` [PATCH 0/4] dw_dmac: introduce generic DMA binding for DT Viresh Kumar
2013-02-20 8:03 ` Vinod Koul
2013-02-20 9:50 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-02-20 9:58 ` Vinod Koul
2013-02-20 11:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201302200950.26182.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.jf.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=djbw@fb.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).